As it has been discussed in the reports done by Christensen
and Brooks, Hendy, and Triosi and Gabriel, comfort foods are a widely known
idea, which most people are able to identify with. It is easy to think of
comfort foods as a scientific concept because when someone is in a depressed or
otherwise negative mood, they will eat some type of comfort food and their mood
will improve for a period of time. For example, when college students are
feeling homesick, they will turn to foods like macaroni and cheese to make them
feel better about being away from home. Personally, when I am having a bad day
and need a pick-me-up, I will turn to Chinese takeout or chocolate ice cream.
There is something behind eating certain foods that makes individuals feel
better when they are down. However, this could be a completely learned
behavior.
In their report, Christensen and Brooks indicate that women
consume an increased amount of carbohydrate and fat-rich foods as a coping
mechanism. They also suggest that women take part in consuming more comfort
food than do men. Each of the three studies identify comfort food as
carbohydrate-rich foods, consumed in times of emotional distress. Triosi and
Gabriel’s report points to the idea that “the ‘comfort’ in comfort food has
real, significant, and consequential psychological roots.” This is a true possibility,
but it is also debatable.
For many years, people have been emotionally eating,
believing that food will provide the comfort they need to feel better. This
response to negative emotions has been passed down through generations. The
participation in this behavior may be studied through scientific methods,
however I am skeptical about the true scientific nature of comfort foods. I
think we all feel better after eating certain foods because we believe that we
should; it is completely mental. Unless there are certain compounds in comfort
foods that release hormones in our bodies to make us happier, they do not
physically alter our moods. If there is no physical component behind comfort
foods, altering the chemicals in our blood, they must be a purely social
construct.
No comments:
Post a Comment