As Rozin states, “A
second cause of fads is social influence. Humans like to do what others are
doing, particularly prestigious others. As more and more people, particularly
elites, adopt a custom, or a line of research, it becomes more attractive.” The
social influence on fads and other eating-related behaviors is one that I’ve
really grown to notice throughout this course. In regards to eating
organically, the idea of this alternative market as being a ‘fad’ is a
definitive possibility. In general, the organic market was influenced by
prestigious, more ethically minded, healthier, environmentally aware, reflexive
consumers. This just goes to show the true power that society has on the
actions of humans. In particular, I never really paid attention to just how
important social and cultural influences really are on our behaviors as
consumers and producers. The role of social and cultural influence is seen in
many areas of food and hunger within our society, some more obvious than
others. For example, as Fitchen (1997) states, the poor’s food choices are
dominated by American culture. This leads them to make decisions, usually poor
in the nutritive sense, and rather strong in regards to what is popular in
culture—they cling to, and subsequently spend more money (most of the time that
they don’t have) on ‘status foods’ because they are culturally accepted. Fitchen’s
research truly drives Rozin’s point home: “As I shifted my interest from food
choice in animals to food choice in humans, it became obvious that culture was
the dominant force in shaping human food choice.” (Rozin, 2007, p. 759).
No comments:
Post a Comment